Phil Zimbardo on the Stanford Prison Experiment, Evil and Heroism
by Philip Zimbardo
In 1971, Dr. Philip Zimbardo led the notorious Stanford Prison Experiment in order to answer the question, “What happens when you put good people in an evil place?” In this interview with Victor Yalom, Zimbardo speaks in-depth on the study, its lessons, and its relationship to Abu Ghraib decades later.
As clinicians, we seek to support individual change—but to what extent are we influenced by the institutions that surround us? Can we ignore the role of systems in our work with clients, or does treatment involve addressing one’s environment as well? In this video, Dr. Philip Zimbardo illuminates the longstanding nature vs. nurture debate in a deep discussion about evil, heroism, and the psychological conditions that impact which way we turn. Here, the former APA president and leader of the infamous Stanford Prison Experiment goes back decades to tell us the story of its participants, the ways in which we internalize the roles given to us, and the compelling ways these factors are still playing out today.

Over the course of his long career, Zimbardo has tackled the question of morality, seeking to understand the power of situations over individuals that lead to corruption and compliance. The 1971 Stanford Prison Experiment was the most notorious of his studies, and here Zimbardo describes its methodology, goals, unraveling, and abrupt cancellation after only six days of its planned two-week run. You’ll watch him reflect on the harsh conditions leading a college-aged group of “otherwise good people” to turn against each other, and hear about his ongoing regrets comingled with important lessons about human nature.

Zimbardo discusses issues such as compliance (what causes us to look the other way), learned helplessness (through the gradual acclimation to fearful situations), and “the illusion of personal invulnerability”—the idea that we would make better choices in similar situations. He goes on to discuss his work as an analyst during the Abu Ghraib trials, bringing his expertise to bear on the psychological processes at work among the guards.

Ultimately, though, Zimbardo’s objective is hopeful: to uncover what inspires heroic acts and promote the development of our collective moral compass. If you’re interested in understanding how psychological and systemic forces create good or evil, you won’t want to miss this compelling interview.

What therapists are saying…

"Clinicians would be wise to understand the social determinants of behavior. There is no better teacher than, 'Mr. Psychology,' Philip Zimbardo. In this intelligent, engaging, and wide ranging dialogue with Victor Yalom, viewers gain penetrating insights into moral disengagement and garner new insights into Zimbardo's groundbreaking research. Knowing Phil for four decades, during which time I have avidly studied his contributions, my clinical efforts have greatly improved."

-- Jeffrey K Zeig PhD, Director, The Milton H. Erickson Foundation
In Depth
Specs
Bios
Disclosures
In 1971, Dr. Philip Zimbardo led the notorious Stanford Prison Experiment in order to answer the question, “What happens when you put good people in an evil place?” This question has served as a throughline over the course of Zimbardo’s long career; in this interview with Victor Yalom, the Stanford emeritus professor of psychology speaks in-depth on the study, its lessons, and its relationship to Abu Ghraib decades later.

Over the course of the interview, Zimbardo describes the arc of the controversial study, with lively storytelling that fascinates even as it counfounds. He goes on to outline the rise and fall of the experiment, the participants’ parents ultimate compliance during its run, and his own internalization of the “prison super” role (only made apparent to him upon his then-girlfriend’s threat to end their relationship). He then extrapolates his findings to the more recent Abu Ghraib trials, where he was involved in examining the systemic torture proliferating among the unsupervised guards.

Zimbardo’s discoveries remain relevant in the age of widespread police brutality charges, an increasingly divided government, and international political strife. You’ll find many compelling ideas to consider from his work, so be sure to take a look at this ever-timely interview.

By watching this video, you will:
  • Learn about the guiding principles and methodology of the Stanford Prison Experiment.
  • Understand Zimbardo’s findings from the study, including thoughts on corruption and compliance.
  • Learn more about what constitutes “heroism,” according to Zimbardo’s more recent research.

Length of video: 1:36:00

English subtitles available

Individual ISBN-10 #: 1-60124-448-7

Individual ISBN-13 #: 978-1-60124-448-2

Group ISBN-10 #: 1-60124-449-5

Group ISBN-13 #: 978-1-60124-449-9

Philip G. Zimbardo, PhD, is a psychologist and a professor emeritus at Stanford University, where he taught for 50 years, starting in 1968. He continues to conduct research at Stanford and teach at the former Pacific Graduate School of Psychology, now Palo Alto University. He is also president of the Heroic Imagination Project, which teaches people how to overcome the natural human tendency to watch and wait in moments of crisis.

Zimbardo is probably best known for his 1971 Stanford prison experiment, which demonstrated the power of social situations to influence people’s behavior. He has authored more than 300 professional articles, chapters and books representing his broad and varied interests in topics ranging from exploratory and sexual behavior in rats to persuasion, dissonance, hypnosis, cults, shyness, time perspective, prisons and madness. His books and textbooks for college students include Psychology and Life, The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil and The Time Paradox.

Philip Zimbardo was compensated for his/her/their contribution. None of his/her/their books or additional offerings are required for any of the Psychotherapy.net content. Should such materials be references, it is as an additional resource.

Psychotherapy.net defines ineligible companies as those whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients. There is no minimum financial threshold; individuals must disclose all financial relationships, regardless of the amount, with ineligible companies. We ask that all contributors disclose any and all financial relationships they have with any ineligible companies whether the individual views them as relevant to the education or not.

Additionally, there is no commercial support for this activity. None of the planners or any employee at Psychotherapy.net who has worked on this educational activity has relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose with ineligible companies.
This Disclosure Statement has been designed to meet accreditation standards; Psychotherapy.net does its best to mitigate potential conflicts of interest and eliminate bias in all areas of content. Experts are compensated for their contributions to our training videos; while some of them have published works, the purchase of additional materials are not required for any Psychotherapy.net training. Each experts’ specific disclosures can be found in their biography.

Psychotherapy.net offers trainings for cost but has no financial or other relationships to disclose.
You May Also Like…