The very best paper on how psychotherapy works was also one of the earliest (written in 1936) - Saul Rosenzweig's “Some Implicit Common Factors in Diverse Methods of Psychotherapy.” It made the bold prediction that the psychotherapy relationship is much more powerful than specific psychotherapy techniques in promoting change. Hundreds of studies comparing different forms of psychotherapy (mostly done during the last forty years) confirm Rosenzweig’s brilliant intuition. Although a given specific technique may occasionally score a small win over another specific technique, the overwhelming number of randomized clinical comparisons result in tie scores.
It’s remarkable how little this robust finding from psychotherapy research has impacted on psychotherapy training and practice. Most training programs focus on teaching just one narrow- gauge technique and their graduate practitioners tend to identify themselves for life by the school of therapy in which they trained. Paradoxically, then, most psychotherapy training pays least attention to what matters most in clinic practice — forming a powerful healing relationship with the patient. And psychotherapy training also often ignores the most important practical issues that help determine the nature of that relationship. If and when should a therapist give advice? What if any is the place of humor in therapy? Is it OK ever to self-disclose? What kind of contact makes sense outside of sessions and after treatment ends? We will briefly touch on these issues.
The patient will always regard the first meeting with a therapist as an important life event and it is important that the therapist never treat it as routine. I loved first meetings — the chance to be helpful; getting to see the world through another person’s eyes; the excitement of a new relationship; the challenge to my empathic and relating skills. Getting information is, of course, an important goal of every first visit, but getting the patient’s attention and confidence is even more important. The patient must leave the session feeling understood, that you care, and that you know what you are doing;
Diagnosis and psychoeducation are part of establishing an empathic relationship. It is a great relief for patients to learn that their previously puzzling symptoms fall into a well-recognized pattern, with a fairly predictable course and well recognized, effective treatments. They are not uniquely damned; not hopeless, not alone.
Treatment plans are negotiated between patient and therapist — never delivered from on high. Options are offered with an explanation of the pros and cons of each- and the patients get to choose what best fits their goals, needs, and resources. Decisions made early can always be revised as more is learned and the relationship deepens.
The patient should leave the first session much more hopeful than before they arrived. This must be based on realistic hope encouraged by the developing new relationship and a sense that presenting problems have been understood and are manageable. But note; there is no room at all for phony reassurance or underestimating the work that must be done. I would often end a first session saying something like: “if you really put your heart into this, and I put my experience, I think that together we can accomplish a lot.”
This is sometimes good advice, especially for very healthy patients — but never say never. For contrast, my commonsense rule of thumb is to titrate advice — the more advice the patient needs, the more advice you should give. This applies especially to patients with more severe psychological problems who sometimes lack the judgment to make good decisions on their own and often don't have other people to turn to for help. Trainers and therapists who preach most vociferously against offering advice must treat only the healthiest of patients.
I agree up to a point, but less dogmatically and categorically. Therapist self-disclosure is indeed rarely necessary, carries risks, and should be reserved for special situations and specific purposes. But again, this is another case of “never say never.” With grieving patients, I’ve often revealed what my own feelings were on the loss of a loved one — as an expression of empathy and indication that exquisitely painful loss is an inevitable and normal part of our shared human condition. I have also on occasion shared work, child rearing, and marital experiences as a way of role modeling methods of dealing with life situations that have worked for me and might work for the.patient.
Self-disclosure must be rare and to the point lest it lose impact and risk being done more for the therapist’s benefit than for the patient’s. I have occasional seen self-disclosure become a boundary violation in itself and on three occasions it evolved into therapists committing even worse Boundary violations. So, handle with care!
Charlie Chaplin said it best: “Life is a tragedy when seen in close-up, but a comedy in long-shot.” Seeing life in a longer shot is an essential part of any good therapy — and shared humor is an essential part of gradually gaining greater perspective. Rarely will shared humor take the form of telling a predigested joke; almost always the wisdom of humor comes from seeing the comedic in everyday situations.
This is not to ignore that the patient is also suffering, but rather to achieve respite, distraction, and distance. A piece of advice I give to almost every patient is to find more good minutes into.every day — and recapturing the ability to smile or laugh is a great step toward more good minutes and better days.
Psychotherapy, like life, is a very serious thing, but both can be much brighter if leavened with a tincture of humor and the benefit of comic distance. Evolution surely built in the universal human capacity for fun because it has tremendous survival value. All work and no play makes therapy very dull for both patient and therapist.
My hypocrisy: I do often express my fear and loathing of Trump on Twitter and even wrote a book about it. Here I felt my responsibility as a citizen trumped my role as a therapist. Others may disagree with this choice — I don't apologize for it but can’t argue against their view.
In contrast, I do recommend having occasional email or text follow up exchanges with patients after therapy ends. My longest such contact has extended for 56 years since the end of our treatment — it consists of brief but mutually satisfying emails exchanged every few months. Follow-ups help me learn what works, and what doesn't in therapy and are encouraging because most people do much better than I expected.
Questions for Thought and Discussion
Which of the author's points resonate most with you?
Which of the author's points are very different from your own, and why?
What would be the top of your list of key elements of therapy?
File under: The Art of Psychotherapy, Musings and Reflections
Like what you are reading? For more stimulating stories, thought-provoking articles and new video announcements, sign up for our monthly newsletter.
It’s remarkable how little this robust finding from psychotherapy research has impacted on psychotherapy training and practice. Most training programs focus on teaching just one narrow- gauge technique and their graduate practitioners tend to identify themselves for life by the school of therapy in which they trained. Paradoxically, then, most psychotherapy training pays least attention to what matters most in clinic practice — forming a powerful healing relationship with the patient. And psychotherapy training also often ignores the most important practical issues that help determine the nature of that relationship. If and when should a therapist give advice? What if any is the place of humor in therapy? Is it OK ever to self-disclose? What kind of contact makes sense outside of sessions and after treatment ends? We will briefly touch on these issues.
Forming A Relationship
The first session with any new patient is by far the most important — if it doesn't get off to a good start toward a strong relationship, there may not even be a second session. And first impressions do have a very strong impact on the later ones.The patient will always regard the first meeting with a therapist as an important life event and it is important that the therapist never treat it as routine. I loved first meetings — the chance to be helpful; getting to see the world through another person’s eyes; the excitement of a new relationship; the challenge to my empathic and relating skills. Getting information is, of course, an important goal of every first visit, but getting the patient’s attention and confidence is even more important. The patient must leave the session feeling understood, that you care, and that you know what you are doing;
Diagnosis and psychoeducation are part of establishing an empathic relationship. It is a great relief for patients to learn that their previously puzzling symptoms fall into a well-recognized pattern, with a fairly predictable course and well recognized, effective treatments. They are not uniquely damned; not hopeless, not alone.
Treatment plans are negotiated between patient and therapist — never delivered from on high. Options are offered with an explanation of the pros and cons of each- and the patients get to choose what best fits their goals, needs, and resources. Decisions made early can always be revised as more is learned and the relationship deepens.
The patient should leave the first session much more hopeful than before they arrived. This must be based on realistic hope encouraged by the developing new relationship and a sense that presenting problems have been understood and are manageable. But note; there is no room at all for phony reassurance or underestimating the work that must be done. I would often end a first session saying something like: “if you really put your heart into this, and I put my experience, I think that together we can accomplish a lot.”
Is It Ever OK Ever to Give Advice?
Many training programs, and their graduates, teach and preach against ever giving patients advice. This is based on the theory that advice always reduces patients’ autonomy and ability to figure things out on their own. In support of this view is the ancient Chinese proverb, “If you give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. If you teach a man how to fish, you feed him for a lifetime.”This is sometimes good advice, especially for very healthy patients — but never say never. For contrast, my commonsense rule of thumb is to titrate advice — the more advice the patient needs, the more advice you should give. This applies especially to patients with more severe psychological problems who sometimes lack the judgment to make good decisions on their own and often don't have other people to turn to for help. Trainers and therapists who preach most vociferously against offering advice must treat only the healthiest of patients.
When Is Self-Disclosure OK?
Many training programs also preach against therapists ever telling patients anything about their feelings, lives, or experiences. This is partly based on the notion that therapists should be a “blank screen,”, partly on the fear that therapist self-disclosure may be self-servingly exploitive and impede patient progress.I agree up to a point, but less dogmatically and categorically. Therapist self-disclosure is indeed rarely necessary, carries risks, and should be reserved for special situations and specific purposes. But again, this is another case of “never say never.” With grieving patients, I’ve often revealed what my own feelings were on the loss of a loved one — as an expression of empathy and indication that exquisitely painful loss is an inevitable and normal part of our shared human condition. I have also on occasion shared work, child rearing, and marital experiences as a way of role modeling methods of dealing with life situations that have worked for me and might work for the.patient.
Self-disclosure must be rare and to the point lest it lose impact and risk being done more for the therapist’s benefit than for the patient’s. I have occasional seen self-disclosure become a boundary violation in itself and on three occasions it evolved into therapists committing even worse Boundary violations. So, handle with care!
Can Therapists and Patients Share a Laugh?
Some, apparently humorless therapists claim that humor has no role in therapy — that, in one way or another, the joke is always at the patient's expense or a distraction from real therapy. This attitude strikes me as being sad for the therapists who hold it and harmful to the patients who are subjected to their prim austerity.Charlie Chaplin said it best: “Life is a tragedy when seen in close-up, but a comedy in long-shot.” Seeing life in a longer shot is an essential part of any good therapy — and shared humor is an essential part of gradually gaining greater perspective. Rarely will shared humor take the form of telling a predigested joke; almost always the wisdom of humor comes from seeing the comedic in everyday situations.
This is not to ignore that the patient is also suffering, but rather to achieve respite, distraction, and distance. A piece of advice I give to almost every patient is to find more good minutes into.every day — and recapturing the ability to smile or laugh is a great step toward more good minutes and better days.
Psychotherapy, like life, is a very serious thing, but both can be much brighter if leavened with a tincture of humor and the benefit of comic distance. Evolution surely built in the universal human capacity for fun because it has tremendous survival value. All work and no play makes therapy very dull for both patient and therapist.
What’s Appropriate on Social Media?
Here I am very strict; perhaps hypocritically so. I don't think.therapists should display their personal lives on any form of social media. Unlike occasional and specific self-disclosure during sessions that is directed to the patient’s specific needs at that moment, social media self-disclosure is generic; self-not-patient centered; and has many risks with no benefit.My hypocrisy: I do often express my fear and loathing of Trump on Twitter and even wrote a book about it. Here I felt my responsibility as a citizen trumped my role as a therapist. Others may disagree with this choice — I don't apologize for it but can’t argue against their view.
When Is It OK to Have Contact Outside Sessions?
Some severely ill and/or suicidal patients definitely need out of session contact — either by phone or (I think preferably) by text. Behavior therapists routinely do sessions out of sessions- accompanying phobic patients when they are beginning to enter previously forbidden territory or situations. And I had a psychoanalyst friend who combined his usual quite traditional practice with doing runs with more seriously ill and demoralized patients who needed behavioral activation. All in all, though, I strongly discourage out of session contact except in special circumstances like these or to help patients experiencing emergencies.Is Contact OK After Treatment Ends?
I think any close nonprofessional contact after therapy ends is a bad idea and should always be off the table no matter how much therapist and patient like each other. It is just too subject to exploitation and the possibility it could ever happen is too likely to influence the therapy before it ends.In contrast, I do recommend having occasional email or text follow up exchanges with patients after therapy ends. My longest such contact has extended for 56 years since the end of our treatment — it consists of brief but mutually satisfying emails exchanged every few months. Follow-ups help me learn what works, and what doesn't in therapy and are encouraging because most people do much better than I expected.
***
As in all useful human relationships, therapy is a two-way street. We usually help our patients. They almost always help us become better people and expand our knowledge of human nature; ourselves; and how the world works. I loved the wonderful opportunity to do psychotherapy and am forever grateful to the patients who shared their lives with me.Questions for Thought and Discussion
Which of the author's points resonate most with you?
Which of the author's points are very different from your own, and why?
What would be the top of your list of key elements of therapy?
File under: The Art of Psychotherapy, Musings and Reflections